Lessons from the Past - The Whisky Bubble (1890s)

History is full of bubbles, booms and busts, corporate collapses and crises, which illuminate the present financial world. At Stewart Investors we believe that an appreciation of financial history can make us more effective investors today.

The Whisky Bubble (1890s)

The price of any asset may be inflated to extreme levels – bonds, property, shares, tulips – whisky.1 In July 1898 the Scottish whisky firm of Pattisons announced record profits and the expansion of its Aultmore and Glenfarclas distilleries. On 24 November the Company was given a clean bill of health by its accountants. Thirteen days later Pattisons went bust, marking the end of the whisky bubble of the late 19th century. The collapse provides a number of lessons for investors.

Whisky Boom

The distilling of whisky expanded significantly during the 19th century, boosted by new technology which allowed distillers to produce larger amounts of spirit much more cheaply. Demand increased as whisky was repositioned as ‘the gentleman’s drink of choice’, replacing brandy. The expansion of the railway network across the UK improved the distribution of the product. 

The 1890s were glory years for Scotch. Demand boomed in the UK and overseas and whisky barons like Buchanan, Dewar and Haig became household names. A distillery building bonanza spread across Scotland, with 39 new distilleries constructed in the decade, reaching a peak with nine being built in 1897 and ten in 1898.2 Distilled volumes rose from 44 million proof gallons (mpg) in 1893 to 63 mpg in 1899, an increase of 43% in six years.3

The Rise of Pattisons

Beginning as an Edinburgh dairy wholesaler, Pattisons diversified into blended whisky to take advantage of surging demand, when brothers Robert and Walter Pattison took over their father’s business. Initially the company purchased whisky from other distilleries and focused on the marketing of its blends, which included Morning Dew and Royal Gordon.

The rise of Pattisons was nothing short of spectacular, culminating in the flotation of the company on the London Stock Market in 1896. The share offer was six times oversubscribed, encouraging other whisky company flotations, and resulting in speculation in whisky company shares, as well as whisky itself. The brothers pocketed the large amount of £150,000 (more than £15m in today’s money)4 from the flotation, but remained in control of the company, holding all the ordinary shares and a quarter of the preference ones.

The 1890s was a decade of easy money with banks providing credit to fund deals in the whisky industry. Pattisons took advantage of this, buying their own distilling assets to secure supply. The company acquired a half share in the Glenfarclas Distillery, substantial interests in the Oban & Aultmore-Glenlivet Distilleries and the Ardgowan grain distillery, and diversified into beer production with the purchase of the Duddingston Brewery in Edinburgh. The low cost of credit made an industry such as whisky, with its large working capital requirements, especially prone to speculative investment.

Marketing Frenzy

Pattisons epitomised the marketing-led whisky firms of the boom years. The company  reputedly spent £20,000 (£2m today) on advertising in 1897 and the vast sum, for the time, of £60,000 (£6m today) in 1898. Reportedly, 500 African Grey parrots were provided free to pubs and licenced grocers. The birds squawked ‘Pattisons whisky is best!’ and ‘Buy Pattisons whisky!’ at potential customers!5

Ostentatious Spending

The brothers courted publicity through their flamboyant lifestyles. Pattisons celebrated its second anniversary with a lavish party at Henley Regatta on an extravagant houseboat constructed for the occasion. The brothers hired private trains to take them back to their estates in the Borders. The Company’s headquarters in Constitution Street in Leith was described as a ‘palace’.

The Fall of Pattisons

But all was not well in the world of Scotch. There were rumours of financial problems at Pattisons as early as 1894, but these were papered over during a period of surging sales. However, in May 1898, there was a hint of things to come when the whisky company J & G Stewart went into liquidation.

On 5 December 1898 Pattisons ceased payment when it ran out of cash; its preference shares falling 55%. A few days later the Clydesdale Bank refused to extend credit to the company, forcing it into bankruptcy. When the Company’s books were scrutinised, the huge sum of £500,000 (£50m today) could not be accounted for. The bankruptcy hit unsecured creditors of the Company, causing further failures across the industry and among suppliers. Whisky prices fell and distillery construction came to a grinding halt.

The Great Whisky Swindle

The brothers were accused of embezzlement and fraud on a grand scale. At their trial, which was a major media event at the time, it emerged that the Pattisons were swindlers of the first rank, pursuing every accounting scam in the book. They had overvalued the Company’s property assets. They inflated the value of their stored whisky and they had paid dividends out of capital rather than income.

It was not only the books that were cooked. The Company was diddling its own drinkers by selling them dodgy whisky! Cheap grain whisky was mixed with small quantities of quality malt and sold as a premier product at high prices.

The brothers were convicted of fraud in 1901; Robert receiving a jail sentence of 18 months in Perth Prison and his younger brother nine months. The entire whisky industry came under intense scrutiny for lax practices and was severely criticised.

End of the Bubble

The glory days of whisky were over (for now). Glen Elgin distillery had opened in May 1900, but closed only five months later. No new distillery was built in Scotland until the Tullibardine distillery, constructed half a century later in 1949, indicating that the dramatic increase in production of the 1890s was based on absurdly optimistic projections of demand growth.

The 1890s Whisky Bubble highlights how investors can be carried away by the  prevailing fad – be it resources, property, technology or whisky. Recent historically high consumption growth rates are projected to continue ad infinitum, with capacity expanded accordingly. The aftermath can be a very painful experience, even for the best operators in the industry. Hence, timing is more important than in steadier, less commoditized, growth sectors. We believe that an historical perspective is very important in investment, but care must also be taken not to become prisoners of recent history.

The bankruptcy of Pattisons underlines the risks of investing in fast-growing companies with a limited performance record which float on the stock market during boom conditions, and are dominated by a sales/marketing culture. When entrepreneurs start to display a flashy lifestyle and/or diversify into areas where they have no experience, this must be heeded.

At Stewart Investors we stress the importance of identifying extreme overvaluation in stock markets to preserve client wealth. We remain focused on the potential downside of any investment as much as the upside.

Important information

This document has been prepared for general information purposes only and is intended to provide a summary of the subject matter covered. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to give advice. The views expressed are the views of the writer at the time of issue and may change over time. This is not an offer document, and does not constitute an offer, invitation, investment recommendation or inducement to distribute or purchase securities, shares, units or other interests or to enter into an investment agreement. No person should rely on the content and/or act on the basis of any matter contained in this document.

This document is confidential and must not be copied, reproduced, circulated or transmitted, in whole or in part, and in any form or by any means without our prior written consent. The information contained within this document has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information. We do not accept any liability for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly from any use of this document.

References to “we” or “us” are references to Stewart Investors. Stewart Investors is a trading name of First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, First Sentier Investors International IM Limited and First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited. First Sentier Investors entities referred to in this document are part of First Sentier Investors, a member of MUFG, a global financial group. First Sentier Investors includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions. MUFG and its subsidiaries do not guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk including loss of income and capital invested.

Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell. Reference to the names of any company is merely to explain the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any of those companies.

Hong Kong and Singapore

In Hong Kong, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. In Singapore, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) whose company registration number is 196900420D. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Stewart Investors is a business name of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited. Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W) is a business division of First Sentier Investors (Singapore).


In Australia, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Limited AFSL 289017 ABN 89 114 194 311 (FSI AIM). Stewart Investors is a trading name of FSI AIM.

United Kingdom

This document is not a financial promotion. In the United Kingdom, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 143359). Registered office: Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EB, number 2294743.

European Economic Area (“EEA”)

In the EEA, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited which is authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (registered number C182306) in connection with the activity of receiving and transmitting orders. Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland, number 629188.

Middle East

In certain jurisdictions the distribution of this material may be restricted. The recipient is required to inform themselves about any such restrictions and observe them. By having requested this document and by not deleting this email and attachment, you warrant and represent that you qualify under any applicable financial promotion rules that may be applicable to you to receive and consider this document, failing which you should return and delete this e-mail and all attachments pertaining thereto. In the Middle East, this material is communicated by First Sentier Investors (Singapore).


If in doubt, you are recommended to consult a party licensed by the Capital Markets Authority (“CMA”) pursuant to Law No. 7/2010 and the Executive Regulations to give you the appropriate advice. Neither this document nor any of the information contained herein is intended to and shall not lead to the conclusion of any contract whatsoever within Kuwait.

UAE - Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC)

Within the DIFC this material is directed solely at Professional Clients as defined by the DFSA’s COB Rulebook.


By having requested this document and / or by not deleting this email and attachment, you warrant and represent that you qualify under the exemptions contained in Article 2 of the Emirates Securities and Commodities Authority Board Resolution No 37 of 2012, as amended by decision No 13 of 2012 (the “Mutual Fund Regulations”). By receiving this material you acknowledge and confirm that you fall within one or more of the exemptions contained in Article 2 of the Mutual Fund Regulations.

United States of America

In the United States, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited, as SEC registered investment adviser. Stewart Investors is the trading name of First Sentier Investors International IM Limited. This material is solely for the attention of institutional, professional, qualified or sophisticated investors and distributors who qualify as qualified purchasers under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (hereafter the “1940 Act”), as accredited investors under Rule 501 of SEC Regulation D under the US Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act), and as qualified eligible persons as defined under CFTC Regulation 4.7. It is not to be distributed to the general public, private customers or retail investors.

Other jurisdictions

In other jurisdictions where this document may lawfully be issued, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 122512). Registered office 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB number SC079063.


  1. In October 2016 a bottle of Glenfiddich Collection 1937 sold for £68,500 at the Bonham’s Whisky Sale – a Scottish auction house record for the sale of a single malt.

  2. Jackson, William J., Paterson, Audrey S., Pong, Christopher K. M. and Scarparo, Smona 2012, ‘How easy can the barley brie: drinking culture and accounting failure at the end of the nineteenth century in Britain’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 25, no. 4

  3. www.measuringworth.com. This figured is obtained using the Retail Price Index and probably underestimates the actual value of the sum.

  4. Further research on contemporary historical sources would be required to determine if this story is apocryphal or true.