Lessons from the Past - City of Glasgow Bank Collapse (1878)

History is full of bubbles, booms and busts, corporate collapses and crises, which illuminate the present financial world. At Stewart Investors we believe that an appreciation of financial history can make us more effective investors today.

City of Glasgow Bank Collapse (1878)

In October 1878 the doors closed at the City of Glasgow Bank (CGB), one of Scotland’s largest financial institutions. CGB’s demise, which was the biggest banking failure in the UK until the global financial crisis of 2007/8, highlights a number of issues around investing in bank shares.

Founded in 1839 at the beginning of the Victorian Age, CGB’s growth, like the British economy, was rapid. By the 1870s it had the third largest branch network in the UK, taking deposits mainly from Glasgow and its hinterland, and lending to local business concerns.

Sudden Failure

In June 1878, the Bank appeared to be in sound financial health; the directors announcing a reasonable dividend and reporting equity of 13% of assets.1 However, by September, rumours were circulating that CGB was in difficulties. The wholesale lending market was becoming reluctant to provide funds. CGB decided to seek support from other Scottish banks, but after an independent audit of its accounts, this was refused, forcing it to cease trading.

Concentrated loan book

From an investment perspective, CGB was a very poor quality company. The loan book was highly concentrated, with just four borrowers accounting for 75% of total loans at the time of collapse. These four were all local businesses deeply involved with Indian and Australasian trade: James Morton & Co., John Innes Wright & Co., Smith Fleming & Co. and James Nicol Fleming.2

In essence, CGB had become a vehicle for funding a small group of mainly Scottish-Indian business concerns, applying Scottish depositors’ money to a risky portfolio of corporate loans. 

For example, James Nicol Fleming and his brother John ‘Bombay Jock’ Fleming established the Elphinstone Land & Press Company to reclaim land from the sea as part of the development of Bombay’s port.3 This sizeable project appears to have been funded by loans from CGB.

In addition to its lending business, the Bank had a highly concentrated investment portfolio, focused on a few foreign assets, principally shares in the New Zealand & Australia Land Co., as well as bonds and shares of the US railway company Western Union. At the time of the collapse, these investments were all substantially under water.


Management acted as disastrous stewards of the shareholders’ capital. Described by one historian as ‘mediocrities and men of straw’4, a number of the directors were outright rogues, simply using the Bank to feather their own nests.

After the collapse, the accounts revealed liabilities exceeded assets by the substantial sum of £5.2m (£455m in today’s money)5 – three times larger than reported equity. The management had been misleading shareholders about the true state of the balance sheet, using fraudulent accounting to boost assets and hide liabilities.

The Bank’s general manager, Alexander Stronach, and one of the directors, Lewis Potter, were found guilty of falsifying the Bank’s balance sheet. Several of the directors, including Potter were leading members of the Free Church of Scotland. They had also manipulated the Bank’s share price and falsely stated the amount of gold it held.6

Potter and Stronach were given 18-month prison sentences and five other directors were imprisoned for eight months. This was only the second imprisonment of directors of a British joint stock bank. However, the paltry length of the sentences did not satisfy an indignant public.

Impact on unlimited liability

The collapse of CGB caused a short-lived panic in financial markets, especially among Scottish banks. Share prices declined sharply over the short-term, but the bankruptcy did not cause a major banking crisis in the UK, and most of the Scottish banks recovered quickly. However, the crash did have a large impact on the economy of the west of Scotland with over 500 bankruptcies directly attributable to CGB’s liquidation.7

There was one significant feature of the collapse which made it very different from the banking collapses of the recent global financial crisis. Shareholders of CGB were exposed to unlimited liability. As a result, the full weight of the crash did not fall on tax payers as in 2008, but on the 1,819 shareholders of the bank.8 At the end of the liquidation process only 129 shareholders and 125 shareholder trustees remained solvent.9 Most of GCB’s branch network and staff were taken over by the Royal Bank of Scotland.

Limited liability, the legal structure under which most listed-companies operate today, limits the losses of shareholders to the amount of initial investment. However, unlimited liability means that, if the company goes bust, shareholders are compelled to make up the difference between assets and liabilities. They can lose substantially more than their initial investment.

The liquidators made two calls on the shareholders to cover the shortfall; in November 1878 demanding £500 per share (£44,000 today), followed by a second, larger call for £2,250 (£206,000 today) in April 1879. These were very substantial sums of money, particularly for the small shareholders whose suffering was widely reported in the press. Their distress resulted in fundraising events and the establishment of a relief fund which had received £379,670 (£34m today) in donations by 1882.


The demise of CGB marked an important point in the history of listed banking companies. Unlimited liability completely disappeared in its wake, although it did survive in some areas of the financial world, such as insurer Lloyd’s of London. From one perspective, however, unlimited liability proved successful. It restricted collateral damage from the bank collapse to a small group of shareholders, who, it could be argued, should have known about the risks. Limited liability banking, of course, did not stop the excessive risk taking which caused the global financial crisis in 2008.

At Stewart Investors we believe that banks are highly cyclical companies and significant care must be taken when investing in them. Such businesses face particular challenges when their peers and clients are carried away by the prevailing fashion. Close attention should be paid to the quality of a bank’s stewards - both the controlling shareholder (preferably a family) and its professional managers.

A bank should use a broad base of customer deposits, and lend only a portion to a carefully chosen and diversified group of borrowers. High risk investment banking and trading activities might be better undertaken by unlimited liability partnerships.

Quality of management is vital. The example of City of Glasgow Bank highlights the risks for investors of management who do not act in the interests of all stakeholders. Finding companies with careful stewards at the helm is one of the most important things we do as investors.


Image attribution: The Trial of the Directors of the City of Glasgow Bank at Edinburgh sourced from the STV article here.

Important information

This document has been prepared for general information purposes only and is intended to provide a summary of the subject matter covered. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to give advice. The views expressed are the views of the writer at the time of issue and may change over time. This is not an offer document, and does not constitute an offer, invitation, investment recommendation or inducement to distribute or purchase securities, shares, units or other interests or to enter into an investment agreement. No person should rely on the content and/or act on the basis of any matter contained in this document.

This document is confidential and must not be copied, reproduced, circulated or transmitted, in whole or in part, and in any form or by any means without our prior written consent. The information contained within this document has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information. We do not accept any liability for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly from any use of this document.

References to “we” or “us” are references to Stewart Investors. Stewart Investors is a trading name of First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, First Sentier Investors International IM Limited and First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited. First Sentier Investors entities referred to in this document are part of First Sentier Investors, a member of MUFG, a global financial group. First Sentier Investors includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions. MUFG and its subsidiaries do not guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk including loss of income and capital invested.

Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell. Reference to the names of any company is merely to explain the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any of those companies.

Hong Kong and Singapore

In Hong Kong, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. In Singapore, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) whose company registration number is 196900420D. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Stewart Investors is a business name of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited. Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W) is a business division of First Sentier Investors (Singapore).


In Australia, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Limited AFSL 289017 ABN 89 114 194 311 (FSI AIM). Stewart Investors is a trading name of FSI AIM.

United Kingdom

This document is not a financial promotion. In the United Kingdom, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 143359). Registered office: Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EB, number 2294743.

European Economic Area (“EEA”)

In the EEA, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited which is authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (registered number C182306) in connection with the activity of receiving and transmitting orders. Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland, number 629188.

Middle East

In certain jurisdictions the distribution of this material may be restricted. The recipient is required to inform themselves about any such restrictions and observe them. By having requested this document and by not deleting this email and attachment, you warrant and represent that you qualify under any applicable financial promotion rules that may be applicable to you to receive and consider this document, failing which you should return and delete this e-mail and all attachments pertaining thereto. In the Middle East, this material is communicated by First Sentier Investors (Singapore).


If in doubt, you are recommended to consult a party licensed by the Capital Markets Authority (“CMA”) pursuant to Law No. 7/2010 and the Executive Regulations to give you the appropriate advice. Neither this document nor any of the information contained herein is intended to and shall not lead to the conclusion of any contract whatsoever within Kuwait.

UAE - Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC)

Within the DIFC this material is directed solely at Professional Clients as defined by the DFSA’s COB Rulebook.


By having requested this document and / or by not deleting this email and attachment, you warrant and represent that you qualify under the exemptions contained in Article 2 of the Emirates Securities and Commodities Authority Board Resolution No 37 of 2012, as amended by decision No 13 of 2012 (the “Mutual Fund Regulations”). By receiving this material you acknowledge and confirm that you fall within one or more of the exemptions contained in Article 2 of the Mutual Fund Regulations.

United States of America

In the United States, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited, as SEC registered investment adviser. Stewart Investors is the trading name of First Sentier Investors International IM Limited. This material is solely for the attention of institutional, professional, qualified or sophisticated investors and distributors who qualify as qualified purchasers under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (hereafter the “1940 Act”), as accredited investors under Rule 501 of SEC Regulation D under the US Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act), and as qualified eligible persons as defined under CFTC Regulation 4.7. It is not to be distributed to the general public, private customers or retail investors.

Other jurisdictions

In other jurisdictions where this document may lawfully be issued, this document is issued by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 122512). Registered office 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB number SC079063.


  1. A financial ratio applied to banks which measures their ability to withstand rising bad debts.

  2. R. Button & S. Knott, Desperate adventurers and men of straw: the failure of City of Glasgow Bank and its enduring impact on the UK banking system, Bank of England publication http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2015.

  3. Hazareesingh, Sandip (2009). Interconnected synchronicities: the production of Bombay and Glasgow as modern global ports c1850-1880. Journal of Global History, 4 (1), 22.

  4. Quoted in Button & Knott.

  5. Measuringwealth.com based on the Retail Price Index.

  6. Richard Saville, Bank of Scotland, A History, 1695-1995, 423.

  7. Saville, 423.

  8. The deposit holders and note holders escaped unscathed as other Scottish banks continued to accept CGB notes and provide services to depositors.

  9. Saville, 423.