Get the right experience for you. Please select your location and investor type.
Thinking circular: Circular economy best practice in the industrial goods sector
Why do we need a circular economy?
Humanity is using nature 1.7 times faster than Earth’s biocapacity can regenerate. This is clearly unsustainable. We need to take urgent action to evolve our economic system from linear to circular.1
How many Earths would we need?2 Assuming everyone lived like a resident of -
Our current economic system is linear. We take materials from the Earth, use them to make products, and eventually throw them away as waste. In contrast, a circular economy seeks to keep resources in use for as long as possible and extract the maximum value from them. It is a regenerative approach which minimises waste, pollution, and the depletion of natural resources.
The following principles underpin the circular economy:
- Eliminate waste and pollution
- Design for durability, reuse, remanufacture and recycle
- Regenerate natural systems
For many products, the solution starts with design. By redesigning products, we can reduce the resources used during the manufacturing process, extend their lifespan, and enable them to be recycled at their end of life.
More information about the circular economy can be found on the Ellen MacArthur Foundation website.
Why did we tender research on industrial circularity?
We take a long-term approach to investment, often holding companies for over a decade. Over this extended period, sustainability issues like circularity are an inseparable component of how we assess risk and opportunity.
As a team of investment analysts who are generalists, we are not experts on every sustainability topic. Commissioning bespoke research from specialist subject matter experts supports our assessment of the sustainability positioning of the companies we own. It also helps us to engage constructively on issues that could impact risk and returns. We recently commissioned research on industrial circularity from Columbia Centre for Sustainable Investment because we believe this is a business-critical issue that will become increasingly relevant over the next decade. The purpose and scope of the research tender is set out here.
The transition to a more resource efficient economy will require companies to adopt circularity into their business models. Companies that integrate circular economy principles into their processes stand to benefit from:
- Reduced manufacturing costs from more efficient design.
- Closer, more recurring, relationships with customers who rely on repair, refurbishment, and recycling services.
- Reduced risk that the growing extended producer responsibility movement forces them to pay for large end of product life externalities (e.g. environmental damage).
We shared some of our thoughts on the circular economy in this article in 2017. We use Project Drawdown’s climate and biodiversity solutions as a framework to map the companies in our portfolios and share this on portfolio explorer. ‘Circular Economy & Industry’ is one of eight drawdown areas we use to group the climate solutions.
What are the key findings?
A shorter version of the research report is available on the Columbia Centre for Sustainable Investment (CCSI) website. This version excludes the detailed assessments of companies included in the original report we commissioned. The report, “Circular Economy in the Industrial Goods Sector: A Framework for Understanding Private Sector Progress and Innovation” defines a framework to assess a selection of companies relevant to us as investors and identifies examples of best practice across the different dimensions of circularity. It focuses on practical, replicable, and scalable examples rather than unproven concepts.
The report identifies five areas of focus:
1) Circular design and production: designing products for greater longevity, ease of repair, recycling, reducing the volume of materials needed for production, eliminating waste, or using recycled materials during production.
Example: Bosch developed a Design for Environment (DfE) standard. This has been applied across their products (including design, manufacture, packaging, transport, use, and end of life). The firm conducts life cycle assessments which evaluate product-specific environmental aspects e.g. use of materials, consumption of energy during manufacturing, use of recycled materials and remanufacturing at the end of the product’s life. By using recycled materials, Bosch’s latest cordless screwdriver lowered its through-life-cycle carbon footprint by 20%.
2) Facilitating life extension and recycling of products: facilitating the repair, refurbishment, reuse, or recycling of products by end users.
Example: WEG takes back used motors (damaged or with low efficiency levels) and provides a discount on the purchase of new high-efficiency motors. This promotes the use of more efficient motors and raises awareness of energy conservation, improving efficiency and reliability, and reducing operating costs.
3) Direct collaboration: collaborating with other firms to achieve circular economy gains or develop new circularity approaches.
Example: Lincoln Electric has piloted a programme which enables customers to return slag (a byproduct of the welding process) to be converted into new flux (a chemical substance used to remove impurities) which the customer can reuse.
4) Standard setting and policy engagement: contributing to wider, societal progress towards a more circular economy, including participating in multi-stakeholder collaborations or lobbying activities which aim to advance circularity goals.
Example: Mahindra & Mahindra speak at various forums such as the World Economic Forum and World Bank convenings to advocate for circular economy practices. In India, they helped lead a circular economy committee set-up by the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, which aims to mainstream the circular economy as a concept.
5) Public reporting: publicly articulating concrete circularity goals and credibly measuring progress against targets in a transparent manner.
Example: Delta Electronics’ publicly available sustainability report lays out a clear approach to identifying and meeting their circularity goals. Their clear and coherent reporting provides a model for other companies.
CCSI found large variances in approach across the companies assessed. Some have barely considered circularity while others have fundamentally overhauled their practices.
Next steps
We hope that by sharing the report with companies and investors it can be a useful resource for anyone interested in evolving their approaches to the circular economy.
We will share the report and engage with portfolio companies, prioritising those that are early in their circularity journey. These companies should benefit more from an introduction to best practice than peers that have already embraced circular thinking.
Through the process of engagement, we hope to learn more about the practical aspects of implementing best practice. This will help us to better understand the risks and opportunities associated with putting the principles into practice which will enable us to evolve our approach to company selection and engagement.
Subscribe to our updates
To get regular updates and content from Stewart Investors, please register here.
Important Information
This material is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice and does not take into account any specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. This is not an offer to provide asset management services, is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security or to execute any agreement for portfolio management or investment advisory services and this material has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Before making any investment decision you should consider, with the assistance of a financial advisor, your individual investment needs, objectives and financial situation.
We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication. To the extent this material contains any measurements or data related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, these measurements or data are estimates based on information sourced by the relevant investment team from third parties including portfolio companies and such information may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material and we do not undertake to update it in future if circumstances change.
To the extent this material contains any expression of opinion or forward-looking statements, such opinions and statements are based on assumptions, matters and sources believed to be true and reliable at the time of publication only. This material reflects the views of the individual writers only. Those views may change, may not prove to be valid and may not reflect the views of everyone at First Sentier Investors.
To the extent this material contains any ESG related commitments or targets, such commitments or targets are current as at the date of publication and have been formulated by the relevant investment team in accordance with either internally developed proprietary frameworks or are otherwise based on the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) Paris Aligned Investment Initiative framework. The commitments and targets are based on information and representations made to the relevant investment teams by portfolio companies (which may ultimately prove not be accurate), together with assumptions made by the relevant investment team in relation to future matters such as government policy implementation in ESG and other climate-related areas, enhanced future technology and the actions of portfolio companies (all of which are subject to change over time). As such, achievement of these commitments and targets depend on the ongoing accuracy of such information and representations as well as the realisation of such future matters. Any commitments and targets set out in this material are continuously reviewed by the relevant investment teams and subject to change without notice.
About First Sentier Investors
References to ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’ are references to First Sentier Investors, a global asset management business which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Certain of our investment teams operate under the trading names FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, RQI Investors and Igneo Infrastructure Partners, all of which are part of the First Sentier Investors group.
We communicate and conduct business through different legal entities in different locations. This material is communicated in:
- Australia and New Zealand by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Ltd, authorised and regulated in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (AFSL 289017; ABN 89 114 194311)
- European Economic Area by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited, authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI reg no. C182306; reg office 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland; reg company no. 629188)
- Hong Kong by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. First Sentier Investors, FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, RQI Investors and Igneo Infrastructure Partners are the business names of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited.
- Singapore by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) (reg company no. 196900420D) and this advertisement or material has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. First Sentier Investors (registration number 53236800B), FSSA Investment Managers (registration number 53314080C), Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W), RQI Investors (registration number 53472532E) and Igneo Infrastructure Partners (registration number 53447928J) are the business divisions of First Sentier Investors (Singapore).
- Japan by First Sentier Investors (Japan) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Service Agency (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Registered Financial Institutions) No.2611)
- United Kingdom by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (reg. no. 2294743; reg office Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7EB)
- United States by First Sentier Investors (US) LLC, authorised and regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission (RIA 801-93167)
- other jurisdictions, where this document may lawfully be issued, by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited, authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ref no. 122512; Registered office: 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB; Company no. SC079063).
To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not liable for any loss or damage as a result of reliance on any statement or information contained in this document. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment products referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.
© First Sentier Investors Group
