Scope 3: Everything, everywhere, all at once

Scope 3: Everything, everywhere, all at once

Why Scope 3 emissions hide as much as they reveal, and what investors can do about it.

Climate change is one of the most urgent challenges of our time, and businesses have a crucial role in addressing it. To align with global goals, companies must significantly reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions across their value chains by 2050.

Whilst in recent years there has been a trend for companies and investors to adopt ‘net-zero’ targets, generally, by 2050, it is important to recognise that each additional tonne of greenhouse gas adds to global warming, so our sights need to be set on achieving net zero as soon as possible. As tricky as the decarbonisation challenge is, we also know that delivering on other sustainable development challenges, particularly human development in low and middle-income countries, will be essential for achieving a zero-carbon economy, as missing one significantly increases the chances of missing the other.

Accounting for corporate emissions can be complex and includes three emission types: Scope 1, 2 and 3. Scope 1 emissions include all greenhouse gas emissions created by a company directly, primarily through burning fossil fuels, but also activities like chemical reactions (e.g. cement production) and refrigerant leaks (e.g. from a retailer’s display fridges). Scope 2 emissions relate to electricity and heat purchased by the company from third parties. To tell Scopes 1 and 2 apart, imagine buying gas for heating that is burnt on site being Scope 1, but if the company’s utility burns the gas and provides steam for heating instead, that would be Scope 2. 

All other emissions related to products and services produced by a company are Scope 3. These include everything from deforestation in a company’s supply chain to the emissions created in the use and disposal of the company’s products. It also includes employee commuting and business travel. In the US, the SEC has proposed including Scope 3 in new disclosure requirements, but the feedback from many asset managers has opposed this move. We believe it is a vital discussion but more nuance and real-world implications are needed.

Identifying companies best positioned to contribute to and benefit from a rapid transition to net zero can be challenging for Scope 1 and Scope 2 but are generally similar for different companies, such as by using renewable energy to reduce Scope 2 emissions. However, Scope 3 emissions are much more nuanced and company-specific. All the more so when considering social and other environmental impacts. For example, how the electrification of transport is driving demand for conflict minerals. While more challenging, the most investment insight can be gained by understanding Scope 3 emissions (for most industries).

However, companies' carbon and climate change reporting remains inconsistent, while approaches to achieving genuine abatement remain contested. The potential for greenwashing, or well-intended but ultimately ineffectual efforts, is high. While leading companies are taking bold actions toward achieving genuine GHG emission reductions across their value chains, this complex work requires more than a single quantitative measure than Scope 3. A narrow quantitative approach risks hiding more than it reveals and almost guarantees unintended consequences. We have already seen this occur in scandals, from worthless forest-based carbon offsets to the Volkswagen emissions scandal.

While Scope 3 emissions are crucial considerations in our investment process, we rarely use the term “Scope 3” because it is not just one activity or impact but hundreds of activities deeply interconnected with other sustainable development considerations. We believe that understanding the true positioning of a company in this context cannot be achieved top-down with broad sector analysis or single Scope 3 numbers which are mostly estimated. Only by understanding companies from the bottom up, with relevant disclosure can Scope 3 emissions be understood with the nuance they require.

For example, one of the most attractive features of the industrial companies we invest in is that they help their customers reduce energy and material use. These companies are leaders or emerging leaders in their respective fields. Their products produce Scope 3 emissions during use and disposal but also create savings versus alternatives. We carefully consider the quality of products that these companies produce, including capital expenditure, and investments in research & development, because we believe these investments will benefit the company as customers increasingly turn to them for help in reducing their carbon footprints.

For consumer goods companies, supply chains are complex, but are essential business issues that we consider when investing. While Scope 3 emissions, particularly from deforestation, are a concern so are the effects on smallholder farmers, biodiversity, food security, water availability, and so on. Because these issues are interconnected, we look for companies with leaders who take their stewardship responsibilities seriously and are working to resolve these complex issues. We regularly commission research to help us to understand these issues better, including on smallholder farmers, palm oil and soy.

Plastic waste is also a significant risk for many of the consumer goods companies we invest in, resulting in Scope 3 emissions upstream, biodiversity and human health effects downstream, and further Scope 3 emissions depending on how the firms dispose their waste. We have long engaged with companies on plastic waste and, in 2016, brought together 11 of the biggest consumer goods companies in India to discuss the issue. In turn, we encouraged these companies to join the Indian Plastics Pact, convened by the NGO WRAP.

In their most recent reporting, three of the four Indian consumer companies we engaged with are collecting more post-consumer plastic waste than they produce and increasing the recycled content in their packaging. While alternatives and avoidance measures are still needed, these actions are helping to close the loop on this source of Scope 3 emissions without calling it that.

Lastly, banks must actively finance sustainable development and a zero-carbon economy if net zero goals are to be met. We have commissioned research on the responsible lending approaches of the banks we invest in and have engaged with some banks on these issues. Scope 3 emissions for banks primarily relate to their lending books or “financed emissions.” In the same practical terms that we consider the issue for industrial and consumer goods companies, banks can improve the quality of their loan books by reducing exposure to polluting activities and lending more to actions that reduce emissions. This is particularly true for banks that help their customers’ future-proof assets by providing capital for retrofitting, which, in many cases, improves the loan's asset value and credit quality and reduces emissions.

The complex and systemic nature of decarbonisation means the solutions are outside an individual company’s direct control; however, by focusing on practical outcomes that improve supply chain resilience or help customers achieve their emission goals, companies can take Scope 3 emissions out of the theoretical and into the real world. In doing so, companies must consider human and other environmental challenges, which require deep engagement and the right values to resolve often thorny issues. A single number will never capture the quality of these activities, so a more holistic picture must be formed.

Rather than Scope 3; it is Scope Everything and they are being produced everywhere, all at once. While measures can be useful, analysing business quality and stewardship remains investors’ best tools for understanding the sources and best solutions for these emissions. Any disclosure requirements should reflect that.

Subscribe to our updates

To get regular updates and content from Stewart Investors, please register here.

Important Information

This material is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice and does not take into account any specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. This is not an offer to provide asset management services, is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security or to execute any agreement for portfolio management or investment advisory services and this material has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Before making any investment decision you should consider, with the assistance of a financial advisor, your individual investment needs, objectives and financial situation.

We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication. To the extent this material contains any measurements or data related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, these measurements or data are estimates based on information sourced by the relevant investment team from third parties including portfolio companies and such information may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material and we do not undertake to update it in future if circumstances change.

To the extent this material contains any expression of opinion or forward-looking statements, such opinions and statements are based on assumptions, matters and sources believed to be true and reliable at the time of publication only. This material reflects the views of the individual writers only. Those views may change, may not prove to be valid and may not reflect the views of everyone at First Sentier Investors.

To the extent this material contains any ESG related commitments or targets, such commitments or targets are current as at the date of publication and have been formulated by the relevant investment team in accordance with either internally developed proprietary frameworks or are otherwise based on the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) Paris Aligned Investment Initiative framework. The commitments and targets are based on information and representations made to the relevant investment teams by portfolio companies (which may ultimately prove not be accurate), together with assumptions made by the relevant investment team in relation to future matters such as government policy implementation in ESG and other climate-related areas, enhanced future technology and the actions of portfolio companies (all of which are subject to change over time). As such, achievement of these commitments and targets depend on the ongoing accuracy of such information and representations as well as the realisation of such future matters. Any commitments and targets set out in this material are continuously reviewed by the relevant investment teams and subject to change without notice.

About First Sentier Investors

References to ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’ are references to First Sentier Investors, a global asset management business which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Certain of our investment teams operate under the trading names FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, RQI Investors and Igneo Infrastructure Partners, all of which are part of the First Sentier Investors group.

We communicate and conduct business through different legal entities in different locations. This material is communicated in:

  • Australia and New Zealand by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Ltd, authorised and regulated in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (AFSL 289017; ABN 89 114 194311)
  • European Economic Area by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited, authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI reg no. C182306; reg office 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland; reg company no. 629188)
  • Hong Kong by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. First Sentier Investors, FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, RQI Investors and Igneo Infrastructure Partners are the business names of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited.
  • Singapore by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) (reg company no. 196900420D) and this advertisement or material has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. First Sentier Investors (registration number 53236800B), FSSA Investment Managers (registration number 53314080C), Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W), RQI Investors (registration number 53472532E) and Igneo Infrastructure Partners (registration number 53447928J) are the business divisions of First Sentier Investors (Singapore).
  • Japan by First Sentier Investors (Japan) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Service Agency (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Registered Financial Institutions) No.2611)
  • United Kingdom by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (reg. no. 2294743; reg office Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7EB)
  • United States by First Sentier Investors (US) LLC, authorised and regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission (RIA 801-93167)
  • other jurisdictions, where this document may lawfully be issued, by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited, authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ref no. 122512; Registered office: 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB; Company no. SC079063).

To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not liable for any loss or damage as a result of reliance on any statement or information contained in this document. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment products referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.

© First Sentier Investors Group