Global Emerging Markets Leaders

Global Emerging Markets Leaders

The strategy invests in 25-60 high-quality emerging markets companies that we consider to be well positioned to contribute to, and benefit from, sustainable development.   

Download overview

The Global Emerging Markets Leaders strategy launched in April 2020. It invests in 25-60 high-quality emerging market companies that we consider to be particularly well positioned to contribute to, and benefit from, sustainable development.

Leaders simply means that the strategy is focused on companies with a market cap value of at least USD1 billion.

Strategy highlights: a focus on quality and sustainability

  • We invest in high-quality companies with exceptional cultures, strong franchises and resilient financials. How we pick companies >

  • Our approach is long-term, bottom-up, high conviction and benchmark agnostic

  • We focus on capital preservation as well as capital growth – we define risk as the permanent loss of client capital

  • Companies must contribute to sustainable development. Portfolio Explorer >

  • We avoid companies linked to harmful activities and engage and vote for positive change. Our position on harmful products >

Latest insights

Quarterly update

Strategy update: Q3 2025

Global Emerging Markets Leaders strategy update: 1 July - 30 September 2025

Emerging markets enjoyed another strong quarter. Given that market indices were driven higher by sharp gains for Chinese stocks that are seen as beneficiaries of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, it is unsurprising that returns from our strategy lagged some way behind those from the benchmark.

Although some of our Chinese holdings, such as Alibaba and Tencent, performed well, not all of our holdings there are aligned with the AI theme. Such periods of thematically driven exuberance can be challenging for long-term investors in high-quality businesses who are disciplined around valuations. But we know that our philosophy and process have been proven to deliver over the long term. One of our team, Doug Ledingham, recently wrote a piece explaining why we consciously resist the growing pressure to focus on the short term:

“At Stewart Investors, we have always sought to occupy a space that protects our clients’ capital. One of the threats we are striving to protect it from is short-termism: from the incessant distraction provided by 24-hour news, from the temptation to digest every morsel of noise, from the danger of trying to react to every macro data point or tweet, and from the pressure to fixate on quarterly earnings. That’s increasingly important in a world where long-term thinking is in increasingly short supply.”

You can read the rest of the piece here: Slow has all the power: why we invest alongside long-term owners. It helps to explain why we won’t be abandoning our core beliefs as long-term fundamental investors to chase the AI-driven rally in a bid to match returns from the index in the short term. 

1406209380

The long-term outlook for Indian companies remains bright

The quarter saw a continuation of an unhelpful dynamic: the significant outperformance of the Chinese market relative to India, to which this strategy has a significantly higher level of exposure. Despite this, we remain enthusiastic investors in high-quality companies aligned with India’s economic development. So far, this year has seen a reduction in income taxes and a simplification of the Goods and Service Tax (‘GST’) system. The Reserve Bank of India, meanwhile, has been cutting interest rates. So demand is now being supported by both fiscal and monetary loosening. 

There is, of course, more to emerging markets than China and India. Recent trip reports from Indonesia, India and the Philippines are available on our Insights page. Having visited South Korea in September, we are increasingly confident in the changes to corporate governance standards that are unfolding in that country. These echo similar reforms seen in Japan and should have positive effects on shareholder returns in Korea and perhaps across the region more widely – a similar mood of reform now seems to be infecting other countries across Asia. 

Continuity and change

It would be remiss not to mention the changes that have taken place at Stewart Investors   over the last quarter. After acting as careful stewards of our clients’ capital over many years, three of our colleagues stepped back from their portfolio-management responsibilities in August and left the business. While the list of portfolio-management responsibilities within our team looks different now than it did when the quarter began, on a deeper level, nothing has changed: the philosophy and approach that has defined Stewart Investors since 1988 is deeply engrained and continues to define what we do. Our structure is flat. Every member of the investment team is first and foremost an analyst and our collective focus is on identifying high-quality companies, with resilient financials, guided by ambitious stewards. 

Jack Nelson remains this strategy’s lead manager. He continues to apply the same principles to managing it that have guided it since its launch, working as part of the same tight-knit group of investment analysts and drawing on a common pool of investment ideas.

Activity

We added three new holdings to the portfolio over the quarter. There were no complete sales.

In addition to Shopee, the dominant e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia, Sea (Singapore: Consumer Discretionary) owns digital entertainment brand Garena and provides digital financial services through SeaMoney. Shopee is increasingly well established around the world, employing 45,000 ‘partner-drivers’ in Brazil.1 We believe Sea now has an opportunity to expand into new markets as well as increasing the penetration of Shopee and SeaMoney. The company’s founder, Forrest Li, remains closely involved in the business but is now supported by a professional management team. He has built a great franchise backed by solid financials (the company has net cash on its balance sheet) that empowers millions of small businesses to grow and create jobs by giving them direct access to their customers.

We also added a new holding in Motilal Oswal Financial Services (India: Financials), a brokerage and wealth management business that is poised to benefit from the desire of India’s increasingly wealthy middle class to have greater access to capital markets. It is still managed by its founders, including the eponymous Motilal Oswal and we can see a steady growth path ahead for the coming decades. 

The final new position is MakeMyTrip (India: Consumer Discretionary), a leading online travel website. It should benefit from a continuing shift in India towards booking travel online. Meanwhile, as the disposable incomes of Indian consumers grow, they will increasingly want to travel overseas as well as domestically. While it is 49% owned by Trip.com, the Chinese online travel business, the company’s founders remain involved in the business’s day-to-day activities, supported by a professional management team. It is already a leader in the online travel space in India but the real growth opportunity lies in the offline segment, specifically in bus and hotel bookings, many of which continue to be made in bricks-and-mortar travel agencies. 

[1] Source: Sea Shopee Celebrates 5 Years in Brazil, Strengthening Income Generation and Entrepreneurial Growth.

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Named new investments disclosed relate to holdings with a portfolio weight over 0.5%. It is not a recommendation or solicitation to purchase or invest in any fund. Differences between the representative account-specific constraints, currency or fees and those of a similarly managed fund or mandate would affect results.

Voting

Voting: Q3 2025

Global Emerging Markets Leaders voting: 1 July - 30 September 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 115 proposals from 14 companies to vote on. On behalf of our clients, we did not vote against any proposals. 

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q2 2025

Global Emerging Markets Leaders voting: 1 April - 30 June 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 444 proposals from 33 companies to vote on. On behalf of our clients, we voted against 10 proposals and abstained from voting on 13 proposals.

We voted against changing the terms of the board at EPAM Systems as the proposed changes would require all directors to stand for election annually instead of on staggered terms. While we understand the rationale for annual elections, we believe that a staggered approach provides continuity and helps prevent excessive turnover. We also voted against changes to limit the liability of certain officers, as we believe the company has demonstrated its ability to attract and retain an admirable management team under the current structure, which encourages managers to think and act as long-term owners. Finally, we voted against the appointment of the auditor as they have been in place for over 10 years. The company has given no information on rotating its auditors, a practice we believe is important to ensure a fresh perspective is brought to its accounts. (three proposals)

We voted against a proposal at MercadoLibre to move the company’s registration from Delaware to Texas as it did not provide clear reasons for the change, and we do not believe the move to be aligned with shareholders’ interests. (one proposal)

We voted against the recasting of votes (the ability for voters to change their original votes on a particular matter in response to new information or changes to a proposal) for directors and the supervisory council at RaiaDrogasil. We believe the principle of recasting votes for an amended group of candidates is poor practice and would prefer the group to be resubmitted for voting. (two proposals)

We voted against the appointment of the auditor at Sunny Optical Technology as they have been in place for over 10 years. The company has given no information on rotating its auditors, a practice we believe is important to ensure a fresh perspective is brought to its accounts. (one proposal)

We voted against the election of a director at Trip.com due to the company's lack of disclosureregarding director attendance, the number of board meetings held, and the voting results from the previous year. Our aim is to encourage greater transparency and adoption of global governance standards. (one proposal)

We voted against the recasting of votes for the supervisory council at WEG as we believe the principle of recasting votes for an amended group of candidates is poor practice and would prefer the group to be resubmitted for voting. We also abstained from voting on a request for a separate board election and the election of a supervisory council position. According to Brazilian voting practices, we are unable to vote for this proposal while simultaneously supporting the board in its candidate elections. (two proposals)

We abstained from voting on proposals relating to the accounts and acts of the board at Regional. At the time of voting, the company had not released its annual report or its audited financial statements, leaving us without significant information to make an informed decision. (10 proposals)

We abstained from voting on the establishment of a supervisory council at TOTVS as the company had not disclosed which candidates would be up for election to serve on the council. (two proposals)

We voted against a shareholder proposal regarding simple majority voting at EPAM Systems as this topic was already covered by the company's own proposal, which we supported. (one proposal)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q1 2025

Global Emerging Markets Leaders voting: 1 January - 31 March 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 45 resolutions from eight companies to vote on. On behalf of clients, we voted against five resolutions.

We voted against executive remuneration at Bank Central Asia because we believed it was excessive. (one resolution)

We voted against the election of two directors and an audit committee member at Samsung Electronics as we do not believe them to be truly independent. (three resolutions)

We voted against the election of the audit committee chair at Unicharm as we do not believe they are independent. (one resolution)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q4 2024

Global Emerging Markets Leaders voting: 1 October - 31 December 2024

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 46 resolutions from seven companies to vote on. On behalf of clients, we did not vote against any resolutions.

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Portfolio Explorer

If you are unable to view the portfolio explorer, please re-open in Google Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari or Opera. IE11 is not supported.

For illustrative purposes only. Reference to the names of example company names mentioned in this communication is merely for explaining the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or investment recommendation of those companies. Companies mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of Stewart Investors. Holdings are subject to change.

Certain statements, estimates, and projections in this document may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Stewart Investors’ current assumptions and beliefs, in light of currently available information, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual actions or results may differ materially from those discussed. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. There is no certainty that current conditions will last, and Stewart Investors undertakes no obligation to correct, revise or update information herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Source: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. Securities mentioned are all investee companies* from representative Asia Pacific All Cap Strategy, Asia Pacific & Japan All Cap Strategy, Asia Pacific Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets (ex China) Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets All Cap Strategy, Indian Subcontinent All Cap Strategy, Worldwide All Cap Strategy and Worldwide Leaders Strategy accounts as at 30 September 2025. *Assets that the strategies may hold which an active decision has not been made, and sustainability assessment does not apply, include cash, cash equivalents, short-term holdings for the purpose of efficient portfolio management and holdings received as a result of mandatory corporate actions. Holdings of such assets will not appear on Portfolio Explorer. Not all strategies are available in all jurisdictions or to all audience types.

The Stewart Investors supports the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The full list of SDGs can be found on the United Nations website.

Source for Climate Solutions and impact figures: © 2014–2025 Project Drawdown (drawdown.org). Source for Human Development Pillars: Stewart Investors investment team.

Source for climate solutions and human development analysis and mapping: Stewart Investors investment team. Contributions are defined by the team as demonstrable contributions to any solution, either direct (directly attributable to products, services or practices provided by that company), or enabling (supported or made possible by products or technologies provided by that company).

Investment terms

View our list of investment terms to help you understand the terminology within this website.