Asia Pacific Leaders

Asia Pacific Leaders

The Asia Pacific Leaders strategy was originally launched in December 2003 and invests in large and mid-sized companies which generally have a total stock market value of at least US$1 billion (hence ‘Leaders’).

This equity-only strategy seeks to invest in between 30 to 60 high-quality businesses in the Asia Pacific region (including Australia and New Zealand, but excluding Japan) that are helping bring about a more sustainable future.

Strategy highlights: a focus on quality and sustainability

  • We invest in high-quality companies with exceptional cultures, strong franchises and resilient financials. How we pick companies >

  • Our approach is long-term, bottom-up, high conviction and benchmark agnostic

  • We focus on capital preservation as well as capital growth – we define risk as the permanent loss of client capital

  • Companies must contribute to sustainable development. Portfolio Explorer >

  • We avoid companies linked to harmful activities and engage and vote for positive change. Our position on harmful products >

Latest insights

Quarterly update

Strategy update: Q3 2025

Asia Pacific Leaders strategy update: 1 July - 30 September 2025

  • Responsibility for managing some of Stewart Investors' portfolios has changed but our engrained investment philosophy, process, and organisational ethos have not.
  • Over the short term, our style of investing, which aims to deliver compelling absolute returns over the long term, has not kept pace with returns from regional indices, which have been led by sharp gains from mega-cap technology stocks.
  • Although we continue to find interesting investment opportunities in China, we are not willing to compromise on quality to invest in many of the country's largest companies, whose recent gains could prove ephemeral.
  • We added new holdings in three companies - Singtel, Jardine Matheson, and AIA - to the portfolio over the quarter.

Review: continuity and change

On one level, the third quarter saw significant changes at Stewart Investors. After acting as careful stewards of our clients’ capital over many years, three of our colleagues stepped back from their portfolio-management responsibilities in August and left the business.

1370806633

While the list of portfolio-management responsibilities within our team looks different now than it did when the quarter began, on a deeper level, nothing has changed: the philosophy and approach that has defined Stewart Investors since 1988 is deeply engrained and continues to define what we do. Our structure is flat. Every member of the investment team is first and foremost an analyst and our collective focus is on identifying high-quality companies, with resilient financials, guided by ambitious stewards. This is the bedrock on which returns from all our strategies, including Asia Pacific Leaders, have been built.

We cherish our team-based approach to identifying high-quality companies

Before being appointed as the lead manager of the Asia Pacific Leaders strategy, Doug Ledingham was already the manager of a number of Stewart Investors’ other Asia Pacific strategies, including the UK-listed Pacific Assets Trust. Those strategies invest in many of the same companies as Asia Pacific Leaders. Doug, meanwhile, continues to apply the same principles to managing this strategy that have guided it since its launch, working as part of the same tight-knit group of investment analysts and drawing on a common pool of investment ideas. He recently wrote a piece explaining why we consciously resist the growing pressure to focus on the short term:

“At Stewart Investors, we have always sought to occupy a space that protects our clients’ capital. One of the threats we are striving to protect it from is short-termism: from the incessant distraction provided by 24-hour news, from the temptation to digest every morsel of noise, from the danger of trying to react to every macro data point or tweet, and from the pressure to fixate on quarterly earnings. That’s increasingly important in a world where long-term thinking is in increasingly short supply.”

You can read the rest of the piece here: Slow has all the power: why we invest alongside long-term owners

Investing in the ‘picks and shovels’ of the AI boom while focusing on the long term 

Our clients have understandably been keen to discuss the changes that have taken place within our business. Set against that, however, we have been careful to ensure that the majority of our time and attention remains on companies. As part of this, we have been discussing the broader forces being felt by companies across the Asia Pacific region, particularly the extraordinary surge of investment in the build out of AI infrastructure. Although AI is often viewed as a US-focused phenomenon, many of the leaders in this space are actually found in Asia rather than America. They include the manufacturers of the advanced semiconductors that supply computing power to AI data centres, the companies whose technology tests those semiconductors for reliability, and the suppliers of essential components to data centres, such as uninterruptible power supplies. 

Many of the immediate financial beneficiaries of the AI infrastructure boom have, therefore, been suppliers of its ‘picks and shovels’. We are cognizant of the intense geopolitical pressures that surround some of these companies, such as the desire of the US to ‘nearshore’ production of semiconductors or to keep the most advanced chips out of the hands of its perceived strategic enemies. These carry the potential to influence corporate behaviour in a way that may not necessarily be to the advantage of long-term shareholders. This is something we are debating and watching closely. 

To deepen their understanding of this subject, two members of our team recently visited South Korea, which, along with Taiwan, is at the heart of the global semiconductor industry. Korea is also enacting corporate governance reforms designed to improve shareholder returns. Recent trip reports from Indonesia, India and the Philippines are available on our Insights page, and a report from South Korea should be available next quarter.

A final illustration of continuity over the past quarter: turnover within the portfolio remained typically low. We added three new holdings while selling five. The final section of this update describes the reasoning behind those changes. Our longstanding clients have grown accustomed to seeing modest levels of turnover within the portfolio and, while there may be periods when turnover waxes and wanes, they should not expect that to change. 

Looking ahead

Today, our companies generally enjoy lower leverage (less debt) and generate higher free cashflows than the benchmark index. This gives them a buffer against any renewed macroeconomic volatility or geopolitical instability. We believe they can use their financial strength to take advantage of any renewed short-term uncertainty and to extend their advantage relative to their peers. Those companies also have multi-year opportunities for growth in front of them. 

At a time of change in markets, trade and geopolitics, our underlying approach remains consistent: we continue to focus on generating attractive returns over the long term rather than attempting to outperform through every short-term period. We look forward to demonstrating the fruits of that approach over the years and decades to come.

Activity

New holding: AIA (Hong Kong: Financials)

Over the course of more than a century, AIA has steadily developed a distinct culture combining a conservative approach to investment with an entrepreneurial structure. Its business is built around a high-quality salesforce who foster long-term relationships with its customers. AIA demands higher levels of professionalisation from its agents than many of its peers, who often rely on armies of part-time agents. Although this means there have been times when AIA has grown more slowly than its peers, putting the needs of its customers above drive for short-term expansion has enabled it to build a premium brand. It now has an opportunity to grow by fulfilling unmet insurance needs across China, India and Southeast Asia. While those countries are getting richer, they lack social safety nets, making insurance products a necessity. This is especially true in China, where the regulator has recently allowed AIA to expand into new regions beyond its historical areas of strength in Beijing, Shanghai, and the Pearl River Delta.

New holding: Jardine Matheson (Hong Kong: Industrials)

Jardine Matheson is a complicated company whose journey towards greater simplicity and professionalisation has the potential to reward patient investors. The current chairman, Ben Keswick, took over from his uncle in 2019. He inherited a sprawling Asian conglomerate whose interests span retail, property, financial services, healthcare, autos, construction equipment, hotels and mining. He has steadily divested non-core assets in a way that would have previously been unthinkable. One result is that debt, excluding financial services operations, fell by more than a fifth over the first half of 2025.1 His vision is to appoint high-quality professionals to run the company’s business units, give them well-defined targets and then grant them autonomy to hit those targets. He keeps a deliberately low profile and acknowledges the missteps the business made over the past decade. Both are valuable signals of humility and an openness to change. 

A new chief executive, Lincoln Pan, is due to join later this year. His initial focus seems likely to be on Astra, the listed Indonesian conglomerate, in which Jardine own a majority stake and which is a major contributor to group cashflows. Political uncertainties are an overhang in Indonesia. But as we discussed in a recent report– Is Indonesia still ‘at a crossroads’? – investing in companies who have been able to grow and refine their franchises, and to generate returns for their shareholders irrespective of the wider flux in Indonesia’s economy and politics, is an exciting prospect. Astra currently trades on price-to-book and price-to-earnings multiples not seen since the global financial crisis; one of Mr Pan’s goals will be to change that. Jardine Matheson is some distance from being the highest quality company in our portfolio, but we believe that will start to change over time.

New holding: Singtel (Singapore: Communication Services)

Adding up the market value of Singapore Telecommunications’ (‘Singtel’) various businesses produces an interesting result. The combined value of its shares in Globe Telecom of the Philippines, Indonesia’s Telkomsel, India’s Bharti Airtel, Thailand’s AIS and its parent Intouch along with its holdings in Singapore Post and fibre optic network Netlink gives a total implied valuation above Singtel’s current market value. That implies that its two core businesses, SingTel and Optus, an Australian telecoms network, have a negative value, despite having 4.5 million and 10.7 million mobile customers respectively.2 This is suggestive of the extent to which Singtel remains out of favour among investors despite the fact that, under the leadership of Kuan Moon Yeun, we believe it is better-managed than it has been for some time. Since 2021, he has been refocusing on its core telecoms businesses by disposing of non-core assets acquired under the previous leadership, which made an ill-fated and costly attempt at diversification by venturing into unrelated areas such as digital marketing and online advertising. While the growth potential of its core units is undeniably limited, they deliver steady, predictable and diversified cashflows. Given that Temasek, Singapore’s state-owned investment arm, is its majority owner, it would appear to serve the interests of the government to ensure that Singtel keeps generating cashflows and healthy dividends.

Sold: Advantech (Taiwan: Information Technology)

Amid market exuberance towards parts of the technology sector, we have trimmed our exposure to it by selling the holding in industrial ‘internet-of-things’ company Advantech, where our levels of conviction were dwindling and whose valuation had begun to appear demanding.

Sold: Dabur (India: Consumer Staples)

Dabur directly contributes to improving the health and wellbeing of the Indian population by selling herbal and Ayurvedic products covering hair care, oral care, health care, skin care, home care, food and beverages. A net cash balance sheet and emerging franchises outside of India provide resilience and potential for further growth. But how much more growth can we reasonably expect? Our sale was a recognition that the valuation being awarded to its shares left no room for disappointment.

Sold: Tata Communications (India: Communication Services)

Tata Communications is in the midst of a transformation, evolving from a utility company into a technology business partner, offering a range of digital services and solutions to its clients. While profitable, this is also a highly competitive area and the valuation of its shares left little room for disappointment. As a result, our conviction here has weakened. We can now find stronger ideas – and better homes for our clients’ capital – elsewhere.

Sold: Tokyo Electron (Japan: Information Technology)

Tokyo Electron sells manufacturing equipment to semiconductor foundries such as Samsung Electronics and TSMC. Having grown increasingly concerned about the valuation on which its shares trade, we believe we can find better homes for our clients’ capital elsewhere.

Sold: Unicharm (Japan: Consumer Staples)

Through the 2010s, Unicharm sold an increasing number of nappies to an aging Japanese population, but we failed to anticipate the difficulties it would encounter in replicating its success in other parts of Asia. With the benefit of hindsight, we misidentified the challenges that confront Unicharm. We believed it was encountering shorter-term, cyclical pressures; in reality, those headwinds are structural. After meeting the company’s management, we concluded it is not responding to tougher competition and decreasing brand loyalty sufficiently quickly. We should have sold our holding sooner.

[1] Source: Jardine Matheson Analyst Presentation: 2025 Half-Year Results, pg 15.

[2] Source: Singtel: Annual Report 2025.

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Named new investments disclosed relate to holdings with a portfolio weight over 0.5%. It is not a recommendation or solicitation to purchase or invest in any fund. Differences between the representative account-specific constraints, currency or fees and those of a similarly managed fund or mandate would affect results.

Voting

Voting: Q3 2025

Asia Pacific Leaders voting: 1 July - 30 September 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 149 proposals from 18 companies to vote on. On behalf of our clients, we voted against one proposal. 

We voted against the re-election of a director at Dabur due to concerns that their additional directorships may hinder their ability to effectively challenge and support Dabur's strategy and operations. (one proposal)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q2 2025

Asia Pacific Leaders voting: 1 April - 30 June 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 296 proposals from 24 companies to vote on. On behalf of our clients, we voted against five proposals.

We voted against proposals on transaction of business at Ayala and Kasikornbank, as they did not provide enough information about the proposals. We wanted to avoid giving unrestricted decision-making power without sufficient clarity. (three proposals)

We voted against the appointment of the auditor at Glodon as they have been in place for over 10 years. The company has given no information on rotating its auditors, a practice we believe is important to ensure a fresh perspective is brought to its accounts. (one proposal)

We voted against the election of a director at Trip.com due to the company's lack of disclosure regarding director attendance, the number of board meetings held, and the voting results from the previous year. Our aim is to encourage greater transparency and the adoption of global governance standards. (one proposal)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q1 2025

Asia Pacific Leaders voting: 1 January - 31 March 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 62 resolutions from 12 companies to vote on. On behalf of clients, we voted against five resolutions.

We voted against executive remuneration at Bank Central Asia because we believed it was excessive. (one resolution)

We voted against the election of two directors and an audit committee member at Samsung Electronics as we do not believe them to be truly independent. (three resolutions)

We voted against the election of the audit committee chair at Unicharm as we do not believe they are independent. (one resolution)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q4 2024

Asia Pacific Leaders voting: 1 October - 31 December 2024

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 52 resolutions from eight companies to vote on. On behalf of clients, we voted against eight resolutions. 

At ResMed, we voted against the Board re-election of Peter C. Farrell who retired from the company over 10 years ago and believe should step down from the Board. We also voted against the re-election of Richard Sulpizio as Chair of the nominating and governance committee, due to the decreasing gender diversity on the Board. We voted against the company’s executive remuneration and payment terms, as we have concerns around the complexity and use of many adjusted metrics. We also voted against the re-appointment of the auditor as they have been in place for over 10 years and the company has given no information on intended rotation which we believe is important for ensuring a fresh perspective on the financial accounts. (eight resolutions)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Portfolio Explorer

If you are unable to view the portfolio explorer, please re-open in Google Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari or Opera. IE11 is not supported.

For illustrative purposes only. Reference to the names of example company names mentioned in this communication is merely for explaining the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or investment recommendation of those companies. Companies mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of Stewart Investors. Holdings are subject to change.

Certain statements, estimates, and projections in this document may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Stewart Investors’ current assumptions and beliefs, in light of currently available information, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual actions or results may differ materially from those discussed. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. There is no certainty that current conditions will last, and Stewart Investors undertakes no obligation to correct, revise or update information herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Source: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. Securities mentioned are all investee companies* from representative Asia Pacific All Cap Strategy, Asia Pacific & Japan All Cap Strategy, Asia Pacific Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets (ex China) Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets All Cap Strategy, Indian Subcontinent All Cap Strategy, Worldwide All Cap Strategy and Worldwide Leaders Strategy accounts as at 30 September 2025. *Assets that the strategies may hold which an active decision has not been made, and sustainability assessment does not apply, include cash, cash equivalents, short-term holdings for the purpose of efficient portfolio management and holdings received as a result of mandatory corporate actions. Holdings of such assets will not appear on Portfolio Explorer. Not all strategies are available in all jurisdictions or to all audience types.

The Stewart Investors supports the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The full list of SDGs can be found on the United Nations website.

Source for Climate Solutions and impact figures: © 2014–2025 Project Drawdown (drawdown.org). Source for Human Development Pillars: Stewart Investors investment team.

Source for climate solutions and human development analysis and mapping: Stewart Investors investment team. Contributions are defined by the team as demonstrable contributions to any solution, either direct (directly attributable to products, services or practices provided by that company), or enabling (supported or made possible by products or technologies provided by that company).

Investment terms

View our list of investment terms to help you understand the terminology within this website.