Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap

Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap

The strategy was launched in June 1988, and since September 2019 has been a dedicated sustainability strategy. This equity-only strategy aims to achieve long-term capital growth by investing in a portfolio of between 30-60 companies in the Asia Pacific region, including Japan, that are helping to bring about a more sustainable future.

The ability to invest directly in Japan allows clients to own high-quality Japanese companies far earlier in their Asian growth journeys, as well as accessing a greater pool of domestic companies with attractive growth opportunities that are positioned to contribute to, and benefit from, sustainable development.

Strategy highlights: a focus on quality and sustainability

  • We invest in high-quality companies with exceptional cultures, strong franchises and resilient financials. How we pick companies >

  • Our approach is long-term, bottom-up, high conviction and benchmark agnostic

  • We focus on capital preservation as well as capital growth – we define risk as the permanent loss of client capital

  • Companies must contribute to sustainable development. Portfolio Explorer >

  • We avoid companies linked to harmful activities and engage and vote for positive change. Our position on harmful products >

Latest insights

Quarterly update

Strategy update: Q3 2025

Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap strategy update: 1 July - 30 September 2025

  • Responsibility for managing some of Stewart Investors' portfolios has changed but our engrained investment philosophy, process, and organisational ethos have not.
  • Over the short term, our style of investing, which aims to deliver compelling absolute returns over the long term, has not kept pace with returns from regional indices, which have been led by sharp gains from mega-cap technology stocks.
  • Although we continue to find interesting investment opportunities in China, we are not willing to compromise on quality to invest in many of the country's largest companies, whose recent gains could prove ephemeral.
  • We added new holdings in two companies – Jardine Matheson and AIA – to the portfolio over the quarter.

Review: continuity and change

On one level, the third quarter saw significant changes at Stewart Investors. After acting as careful stewards of our clients’ capital over many years, three of our colleagues stepped back from their portfolio-management responsibilities in August and left the business.

510740838

While our team looks different now than it did when the quarter began, on a deeper level, nothing has changed: the philosophy and approach that has defined Stewart Investors since 1988 is deeply engrained and continues to define what we do. Our structure is flat. Every member of the investment team is first and foremost an analyst and our collective focus is on identifying high-quality companies, with resilient financials, guided by ambitious stewards. This is the bedrock on which the returns of all our strategies, including Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap, have been built.

This strategy’s manager has not changed. Doug Ledingham continues to apply the same principles to managing this strategy that have guided it since its launch, working as part of the same tight-knit group of investment analysts and drawing on a common pool of investment ideas. He recently wrote a piece explaining why we consciously resist the growing pressure to focus on the short term:

“At Stewart Investors, we have always sought to occupy a space that protects our clients’ capital. One of the threats we are striving to protect it from is short-termism: from the incessant distraction provided by 24-hour news, from the temptation to digest every morsel of noise, from the danger of trying to react to every macro data point or tweet, and from the pressure to fixate on quarterly earnings. That’s increasingly important in a world where long-term thinking is in increasingly short supply.”

You can read the rest of the piece here: Slow has all the power: why we invest alongside long-term owners

Investing in the ‘picks and shovels’ of the AI boom while focusing on the long term 

Our clients have understandably been keen to discuss the changes that have taken place within our business. Set against that, however, we have been careful to ensure that the majority of our time and attention remains on companies. As part of this, we have been discussing the broader forces being felt by companies across the Asia Pacific region, particularly the extraordinary surge of investment in the build out of AI infrastructure. Although AI is often viewed as a US-focused phenomenon, many of the leaders in this space are actually found in Asia rather than America. They include the manufacturers of the advanced semiconductors that supply computing power to AI data centres, the companies whose technology tests those semiconductors for reliability, and the suppliers of essential components to data centres, such as uninterruptible power supplies. 

Many of the immediate financial beneficiaries of the AI infrastructure boom have, therefore, been suppliers of its ‘picks and shovels’. We are cognizant of the intense geopolitical pressures that surround some of these companies, such as the desire of the US to ‘nearshore’ production of semiconductors or to keep the most advanced chips out of the hands of its perceived strategic enemies. These carry the potential to influence corporate behaviour in a way that may not necessarily be to the advantage of long-term shareholders. This is something we are debating and watching closely. 

To deepen their understanding of this subject, two members of our team recently visited South Korea, which, along with Taiwan, is at the heart of the global semiconductor industry. Korea is also enacting corporate governance reforms designed to improve shareholder returns. Recent trip reports from Indonesia, India and the Philippines are available on our Insights page, and a report from South Korea should be available next quarter.

A final illustration of continuity over the past quarter: turnover within the portfolio remained typically low. We added two new holdings while making no complete sales. The final section of this update describes the reasoning behind those changes. Our longstanding clients have grown accustomed to seeing modest levels of turnover within the portfolio and, while there may be periods when turnover waxes and wanes, they should not expect that to change. 

Looking ahead

Today, our companies generally enjoy lower leverage (less debt) and generate higher free cashflows than the benchmark index. This gives them a buffer against any renewed macroeconomic volatility or geopolitical instability. We believe they can use their financial strength to take advantage of any renewed short-term uncertainty and to extend their advantage relative to their peers. Those companies also have multi-year opportunities for growth in front of them. 

At a time of change in markets, trade and geopolitics, our underlying approach remains consistent: we continue to focus on generating attractive returns over the long term rather than attempting to outperform through every short-term period. We look forward to demonstrating the fruits of that approach over the years and decades to come.

Activity

New holding: AIA (Hong Kong: Financials)

Over the course of more than a century, AIA has steadily developed a distinct culture combining a conservative approach to investment with an entrepreneurial structure. Its business is built around a high-quality salesforce who foster long-term relationships with its customers. AIA demands higher levels of professionalisation from its agents than many of its peers, who often rely on armies of part-time agents. Although this means there have been times when AIA has grown more slowly than its peers, putting the needs of its customers above drive for short-term expansion has enabled it to build a premium brand. It now has an opportunity to grow by fulfilling unmet insurance needs across China, India and Southeast Asia. While those countries are getting richer, they lack social safety nets, making insurance products a necessity. This is especially true in China, where the regulator has recently allowed AIA to expand into new regions beyond its historical areas of strength in Beijing, Shanghai, and the Pearl River Delta.

New holding: Jardine Matheson (Hong Kong: Industrials)

Jardine Matheson is a complicated company whose journey towards greater simplicity and professionalisation has the potential to reward patient investors. The current chairman, Ben Keswick, took over from his uncle in 2019. He inherited a sprawling Asian conglomerate whose interests span retail, property, financial services, healthcare, autos, construction equipment, hotels and mining. He has steadily divested non-core assets in a way that would have previously been unthinkable. One result is that debt, excluding financial services operations, fell by more than a fifth over the first half of 2025.1 His vision is to appoint high-quality professionals to run the company’s business units, give them well-defined targets and then grant them autonomy to hit those targets. He keeps a deliberately low profile and acknowledges the missteps the business made over the past decade. Both are valuable signals of humility and an openness to change. 

A new chief executive, Lincoln Pan, is due to join later this year. His initial focus seems likely to be on Astra, the listed Indonesian conglomerate, in which Jardine own a majority stake and which is a major contributor to group cashflows. Political uncertainties are an overhang in Indonesia. But as we discussed in a recent report– Is Indonesia still ‘at a crossroads’? – investing in companies who have been able to grow and refine their franchises, and to generate returns for their shareholders irrespective of the wider flux in Indonesia’s economy and politics, is an exciting prospect. Astra currently trades on price-to-book and price-to-earnings multiples not seen since the global financial crisis; one of Mr Pan’s goals will be to change that. Jardine Matheson is some distance from being the highest quality company in our portfolio, but we believe that will start to change over time.

[1] Source: Jardine Matheson Analyst Presentation: 2025 Half-Year Results, pg 15.

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Named new investments disclosed relate to holdings with a portfolio weight over 0.5%. It is not a recommendation or solicitation to purchase or invest in any fund. Differences between the representative account-specific constraints, currency or fees and those of a similarly managed fund or mandate would affect results.

Voting

Voting: Q3 2025

Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap voting: 1 July  - 30 September 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 195 proposals from 22 companies to vote on. On behalf of our clients, we voted against two proposals. 

We voted against a proposal on transaction of business at Philippine Seven, as they did not provide enough information about the proposals. We wanted to avoid giving them unrestricted decision-making power without sufficient clarity. (one proposal)

We voted against the appointment of the auditor at Vitasoy, as they have been in place for over ten years. The company has given no information on intended rotation which we believe is important for ensuring a fresh perspective on the accounts. (one proposal)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q2 2025

Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap voting: 1 April - 30 June 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 339 proposals from 26 companies to vote on. On behalf of our clients, we voted against two proposals.

We voted against the appointment of the auditor at Glodon as they have been in place for over 10 years. The company has given no information on rotating its auditors, a practice we believe is important to ensure a fresh perspective is brought to its accounts. (one proposal)

We voted against a request for approval to invest in wealth management products at Zhejiang Supor as we believe it carries excessive risk relative to the limited additional returns these products would provide. Making such financial investments is not central to the business and we believe surplus cash is better kept in time deposits at banks. (one proposal)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q1 2025

Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap voting: 1 January - 31 March 2025

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 72 resolutions from 14 companies to vote on. On behalf of clients, we voted against six resolutions.

We voted against executive remuneration at Bank Central Asia because we believed it was excessive. (one resolution)

We voted against the election of a director and their remuneration at IndiaMART as we seek to encourage greater diversity and independence on the board. (one resolution)

We voted against the election of two directors and an audit committee member at Samsung Electronics as we do not believe them to be truly independent. (three resolutions)

We voted against the election of the audit committee chair at Unicharm as we do not believe they are independent. (one resolution)

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Voting: Q4 2024

Asia Pacific and Japan All Cap voting: 1 October - 31 December 2024

Voting by country of origin

Voting by proposal category

During the quarter there were 47 resolutions from 10 companies to vote on. On behalf of clients, we did not vote against any resolutions.

Source for company information: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity. Portfolio data shown is from representative strategy accounts of the strategy shown above. Voting chart numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding. SHP means: Shareholder Proposal.

Portfolio Explorer

If you are unable to view the portfolio explorer, please re-open in Google Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari or Opera. IE11 is not supported.

For illustrative purposes only. Reference to the names of example company names mentioned in this communication is merely for explaining the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or investment recommendation of those companies. Companies mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of Stewart Investors. Holdings are subject to change.

Certain statements, estimates, and projections in this document may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Stewart Investors’ current assumptions and beliefs, in light of currently available information, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual actions or results may differ materially from those discussed. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. There is no certainty that current conditions will last, and Stewart Investors undertakes no obligation to correct, revise or update information herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Source: Stewart Investors investment team and company data. Securities mentioned are all investee companies* from representative Asia Pacific All Cap Strategy, Asia Pacific & Japan All Cap Strategy, Asia Pacific Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets (ex China) Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets Leaders Strategy, Global Emerging Markets All Cap Strategy, Indian Subcontinent All Cap Strategy, Worldwide All Cap Strategy and Worldwide Leaders Strategy accounts as at 30 September 2025. *Assets that the strategies may hold which an active decision has not been made, and sustainability assessment does not apply, include cash, cash equivalents, short-term holdings for the purpose of efficient portfolio management and holdings received as a result of mandatory corporate actions. Holdings of such assets will not appear on Portfolio Explorer. Not all strategies are available in all jurisdictions or to all audience types.

The Stewart Investors supports the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The full list of SDGs can be found on the United Nations website.

Source for Climate Solutions and impact figures: © 2014–2025 Project Drawdown (drawdown.org). Source for Human Development Pillars: Stewart Investors investment team.

Source for climate solutions and human development analysis and mapping: Stewart Investors investment team. Contributions are defined by the team as demonstrable contributions to any solution, either direct (directly attributable to products, services or practices provided by that company), or enabling (supported or made possible by products or technologies provided by that company).

Investment terms

View our list of investment terms to help you understand the terminology within this website.