Climate change statement

Climate change statement

Our goal is to achieve long-term capital growth for our clients by investing in high-quality companies that contribute to, and benefit from, sustainable development. Understanding how climate change will impact our investments is fundamental to this goal. 

Climate change and our investment philosophy

Our goal is to achieve long-term capital growth for our clients by investing in high-quality companies that contribute to, and benefit from, sustainable development. Understanding how climate change will impact our investments is fundamental to this goal. This includes:

  • Recognising the risks – and opportunities – that will arise from the social and economic adjustments needed in an increasingly carbon-constrained world, and the unavoidable impacts that a more extreme and chaotic climate will have.
  • Investing in those companies that will prosper by supporting society through these changes and avoiding those who face unacceptable risks.
  • Understanding how climate change interacts with other sustainable development opportunities and challenges, and what this means for the companies we invest in.

We believe there are opportunities for companies to benefit from these shifts in all industries and countries. Many of the companies we invest in are exposed to the growing demand for more resilient products and services that drive lower carbon footprints across the economy. We have assessed that more than 60% of the companies we invest in (at the end of 2024) are contributing to climate solutions, and disclose these for each company on Portfolio Explorer.

How the companies we invest in contribute to climate solutions

Climate change solutions
(number of contributions made by the companies to each solution)

Source: Stewart Investors, company data and © Project Drawdown (drawdown.org). Number of solutions and companies as of 31 December 2024. Contributions are defined by the team as demonstrable contributions to any solution, either direct (directly attributable to products, services or practices provided by that company), or enabling (supported or made possible by products or technologies provided by that company). It is not to be read as implying that Project Drawdown has reviewed or otherwise endorsed the Stewart Investors framework.

Managing risk is as important as seeking opportunities. For example, we do not invest in fossil fuel companies in part because the energy transition puts their shareholders’ capital at risk of permanent loss.

Given the scale of the changes required, we also need to be mindful of companies’ capacity to evolve. We believe that focusing on the quality of a company’s management, its franchise and its financials is the best way to manage these risks. We believe that businesses with strong balance sheets led by long-term stewards in growing industries have the greatest ability to adapt as the economy, society and the climate change in the years and decades ahead.

Our climate commitments, targets and aspirations

We will:

  • Allocate capital to high-quality companies that are developing and implementing solutions to alleviate climate change and biodiversity loss, while not investing in fossil fuel companies1.
  • Provide full transparency on our investments and map them to Project Drawdown’s climate change solutions on Portfolio Explorer, illustrating how companies are contributing to reducing emissions and helping to inform and focus our engagement efforts2.
  • Encourage companies to take positive action to reduce emissions and to use their influence to drive change across their value chains. We will also encourage them to ensure equitable treatment of all their stakeholders during the transition to a carbon-constrained economy3.
  • Reduce emissions in our own operations and offset whatever emissions we cannot remove.

In 2022, we released our first climate report. This set a baseline for our portfolio and operational emissions and set four targets for improvement. We also signed up to the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative (NZAMi). Further information on our progress on these targets can be found in our Annual Review 2024.

Our climate aspirations for 2030

Our investment philosophy focuses on investing in high-quality companies contributing to sustainable development. This approach – and our engagement efforts – remain the primary means by which we can make a positive difference on climate change. Quality, sustainability and valuation are at the core of our investment philosophy and we will not compromise on any of these aspects in pursuit of our climate goals. 

No single measure or set of targets can fully capture the challenges posed by sustainable development. Some measures, however, are better than others. So, in 2024 we reviewed our climate-related targets with three intentions:

  • To simplify and better align them with our investment philosophy.
  • To use measures that better reflect real-world emissions performance.
  • To focus on those areas where we can have the greatest influence.

Following our review, we have updated our aspirational targets as follows:

  1. On average, the companies we invest in will have reduced their carbon intensity4 by 7% per annum over five years.
  2. 100% will be disclosing their Scope 1 & 2 emissions.
  3. 80% will have emission targets.
  4. Our operational emissions will be net-zero (Scope 1 & 2).

We recognise that our ability to influence company behaviour is limited and that whether we hit these targets is not wholly within our control. Equally, we believe setting these targets supports our engagement efforts and sends a positive signal to companies and other stakeholders. 

Climate change statement Q&A

What are the key climate-related risks in the team's portfolios?

Climate change risks and opportunities are relevant to all companies, albeit in different ways, to different extents, and over different time horizons. These risks can be ‘direct’ (related to a company’s operations) or ‘indirect’ (related to a company’s supply chains or demand for its products and services).

Our investment process focuses on the specific risks and opportunities facing individual companies. These include physical, transition, regulatory, fiduciary and reputational risks. We provide detailed descriptions of every company we invest in on Portfolio Explorer. It also sets out key risks, areas to improve and a description of any climate change solutions the company is contributing to.

While physical, transition and regulatory risks facing companies are often apparent (depending on the industry or location of a company’s direct operations) indirect risks can sometimes be more difficult to ascertain. Fiduciary and reputational risks pertain to the stewardship, competence, integrity and vision of a company’s management and board, and so can relate to almost any company.

How do you identify these risks?

Our investment philosophy seeks to invest in companies which both contribute to, and benefit from, sustainable development, achieving positive social and environmental outcomes.

Every investment decision we make assesses the sustainability positioning (both risks and opportunities) of the companies that we invest in from multiple perspectives. That assessment includes:

  • Detailed company analysis – including a quality and sustainability assessment.
  • Discussion and debate among the investment team.
  • Meetings with company management and key stakeholders, including competitors and Non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
  • Weekly team and strategy meetings.
  • Commissioning independent, third-party research to enhance our understanding of various aspects of a company’s quality, including climate risks.
  • Utilising third-party frameworks and external research to supplement and/or validate our own research.
  • Ongoing monitoring (using internal and external research) to check company exposure to harmful or controversial products, services or practices.

How do you manage these risks?

We incorporate climate-related risks and opportunities in our company-level analysis. This can include examining the sustainability positioning of a company’s product mix and its end markets alongside the emissions intensity of its operations and its supply chains. We avoid companies who we believe face significant risks in these areas.

We recognise, however, that it is impossible to reduce systemic risks – such as climate change – to zero. Physical risks such as extreme weather events can have negative impacts on a company’s assets, employees, essential infrastructure, and its supply chains.

International Financial Reporting Standards for climate-related disclosures (IFRS S2) include a recommendation that companies perform climate-related scenario analysis. While we don’t believe undertaking broad scenario analysis is particularly effective in helping us to understand climate change-related risks on a portfolio level, we do consider the impact that a range of different scenarios (not just climate scenarios) would have at a company level.

Investing in quality companies

We only invest in what we believe to be high-quality companies. These are companies that have:

  • Exceptional management teams and cultures.
  • Enduring franchises with strong market positions and reputations.
  • Sound financials with low debt, sustainable margins and free cashflow.

We believe that quality companies like these are in a better position to make the long-term investments needed to transition to net zero emissions.

Engagement

Company engagement is a critical part of the way that we invest.

Engagement helps us build confidence in company’s management and is the means through which we encourage companies to improve. We believe constructive engagement is vital for the success of long-term investors with a 10-year plus investment horizon.

We encourage companies to take positive actions and to use their influence across their value chains to drive reductions in emissions, while also striving to ensure equitable treatment of all their stakeholders in the transition to a carbon-constrained economy.

What targets and objectives have you set?

Our investment philosophy focuses on investing in high-quality companies contributing to sustainable development. This approach – and our engagement efforts – remain the primary means by which we can make a positive difference on climate change. Quality, sustainability and valuation are at the core of our investment philosophy and we will not compromise on any of these aspects in pursuit of our climate goals. 

No single measure or set of targets can fully capture the challenges posed by sustainable development. Some measures, however, are better than others. So, in 2024 we reviewed our climate-related targets with three intentions:

  • To simplify and better align them with our investment philosophy.
  • To use measures that better reflect real-world emissions performance.
  • To focus on those areas where we can have the greatest influence.

Following our review, we have updated our aspirational targets as follows:

·     On average, the companies we invest in will have reduced their carbon intensity by 7% per annum over five years.

  • 100% will be disclosing their Scope 1 & 2 emissions.
  • 80% will have emission targets.
  • Our operational emissions will be net-zero (Scope 1 & 2)

We recognise that our ability to influence company behaviour is limited and that whether we hit these targets is not wholly within our control. Equally, we believe setting these targets supports our engagement efforts and sends a positive signal to companies and other stakeholders. 

Why shift from portfolio footprint to emissions intensity targets?

Portfolio-level footprint emissions are influenced by fund flows and portfolio turnover. For example, only 35% of the companies whose shares we held in 20237 were held by our strategies in 2019, when we set our baseline for comparison. That means subsequent comparisons primarily reflect changes in the composition of our funds and strategies rather than actual changes in emissions performance of companies.

Instead, we now track changes the emissions intensity of our current holdings, irrespective of when we bought them, showing whether their carbon efficiency is improving.

How do you calculate carbon intensity?

This is simply a company’s Scope 1 and 2 emissions divided by its revenues (USD millions), using the most recent available data. Companies with poor-quality past estimates are excluded until full data is reported.

Why measure emissions intensity rather than absolute emissions?

Emissions intensity is a measure of a company’s carbon efficiency. Our focus on quality means we are always looking for companies that are improving over time. An improvement in emissions intensity suggests that a business is generating more revenues without creating more pollution. When intensity falls to zero, so do emissions.

Like all climate metrics, emissions intensity has its drawbacks. We accept that for some companies, denominators other than revenue (such as emissions per tonne of production or per employee) are more appropriate measures of efficiency. But because revenues are something that all companies report, they give us a useful common denominator.

The limitation of individual metrics is why we provide detailed information on the investment case and sustainable development contributions of all the companies we invest in on Portfolio Explorer.

Why do you no longer measure portfolio emissions relative to a historic baseline?

Although we will continue to report on portfolio-level footprint emissions and other standard measures, our new target focuses on the change in emissions intensity for the companies we currently hold. The proportion of our funds that are invested in a particular company or sector changes over time as we find new investment opportunities. Focusing on a historic baseline might discourage investment in companies with greater potential to reduce their emissions if they have higher starting emissions than companies they are replacing. 

Why drop the target for Scope 3 emissions?

Our Scope 3 emissions arise from business travel, which remains essential to our work as global investors. A lack of low-carbon international travel options means we are not able to materially reduce these emissions – but we will continue to work on ways to make our business travel more carbon efficient. Scope 3 goals may be reinstated once lower-carbon travel options improve.

Are these new targets less ambitious?

Not in our view. We have learned lessons since setting our original targets and believe our updated targets better reflect real-world company improvements. Portfolio-level footprint emissions and changes in its average carbon intensity are not directly comparable metrics. We believe a 7% reduction in intensity per year is meaningful. 

Do you use offsets?

Yes. We offset all operational emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3). This helps us to incorporate a cost of carbon into our business while supporting the transition to a carbon-constrained economy. We prioritise high-quality offsets (Gold Standard, Plan Vivo) and treat offsets as a business expense.

Footnotes

  1. Any reference to Project Drawdown is to describe the publicly available materials utilised by Stewart Investors in formulating its sustainability analysis. It is not intended to be, and should not be, read as constituting or implying that Project Drawdown has reviewed or otherwise endorsed the Stewart Investors framework.

  2. Carbon intensity is calculated as a company’s Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions divided by its revenues in millions of US dollars.

  3. Scope 1: These are the direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources owned or controlled by the companies we invest in. Scope 2: These are the indirect greenhouse gas emissions that arise when a company buys energy inputs, such as electricity, heat or steam. Scope 3: The carbon emissions of a company’s supply chain and/or the use of its products and services.

  4. Carbon intensity is calculated as a company’s Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions divided by its revenues in millions of US dollars.

  5. Data is provided once a year in January once emissions data for all companies in a given year have been reported. The latest data is for 2023.

Investment terms

View our list of investment terms to help you understand the terminology within this website.

Want to know more?

 

Important Information

The information contained within this material is generic in nature and does not contain or constitute investment or investment product advice.  The information has been obtained from sources that First Sentier Investors (“FSI”) believes to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information.  To the extent permitted by law, neither FSI, nor any of its associates, nor any director, officer or employee accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising directly or indirectly from any use of this material. 

This material has been prepared for general information purpose. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render special advice. The views expressed herein are the views of the writer at the time of issue and not necessarily views of FSI.  Such views may change over time.  This is not an offer document, and does not constitute an investment recommendation. No person should rely on the content and/or act on the basis of any matter contained in this material without obtaining specific professional advice.  The information in this material may not be reproduced in whole or in part or circulated without the prior consent of FSI.  This material shall only be used and/or received in accordance with the applicable laws in the relevant jurisdiction.

Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the same.  All securities mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of First Sentier Investors’ portfolios at a certain point in time, and the holdings may change over time.

In Hong Kong, this material is issued by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. In Singapore, this material is issued by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) whose company registration number is 196900420D. This advertisement or material has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.  First Sentier Investors, FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, Realindex Investments and Igneo Infrastructure Partners are the business names of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited. First Sentier Investors (registration number 53236800B), FSSA Investment Managers (registration number 53314080C), Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W), Realindex Investments (registration number 53472532E) and Igneo Infrastructure Partners (registration number 53447928J) are the business divisions of First Sentier Investors (Singapore). 

First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and First Sentier Investors (Singapore) are part of the investment management business of First Sentier Investors, which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (“MUFG”), a global financial group. First Sentier Investors includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions.

MUFG and its subsidiaries are not responsible for any statement or information contained in this material. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this material or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.