Regulatory developments in sustainable finance
2020 saw regulatory developments in sustainable finance reach new levels globally, but particularly in Europe. These developments, combined with a global pandemic, unprecedented wildfires, and a renewed focus on social movements like Black Lives Matter, put sustainable finance under the spotlight more than ever.Download PDF version
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and sustainability now form a central plank of the European approach to financial regulation. The intention is that financial services firms, particularly asset managers, play a key role in the allocation of capital to businesses that will drive the transition to a low carbon and more sustainable economy.
The policy agenda, known as the EU Sustainable Finance Action Plan, includes mandatory reporting and disclosure regulations in the form of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR). This set of regulations has been an important focus for Stewart Investors over the last several months. The SFDR establishes a hierarchy of self-assigning fund categories based on investment focus. Two categories in the product hierarchy are relevant here.
• Article 8 funds are those that promote environmental or social benefits, among other things, but whose core objective is not to achieve specific ESG impacts. Article 8 funds will have to state in certain fund documentation, including the legal fund offering document (know as the prospectus in European jurisdictions), that they do not have a sustainability objective.
• Article 9 funds are those with a clear sustainable investment objective, incorporating both environmental and social aims, and that also meet various sustainability-related disclosure and reporting requirements.
The consultation on the legislation only closed last September. The technical guidance on implementation is only expected in the early part of 2021. Yet the EU Commission have made March 2021 the deadline for pre-contractual (Level 1) disclosures regarding sustainability.
We are working to ensure all existing and planned funds in our vehicle for European clients are Article 9 compliant by the deadline. This does not require any change to our investment approach, but it does require us to change the way we explain and illustrate the sustainable development benefits of our approach. Examples of steps we have taken include our work on Project Drawdown, Human Development Indicators and our interactive map which provides information on the investment rationale for every company we invest in, the contribution it makes to sustainable development, key risks and engagement topics.
What does Article 9 require us to do?
We do not need to change our Investment Objective in the prospectus, but we will add to the descriptions of our Investment Policy and Strategy:
• A description of the sustainable investment objective
• An explanation of how the investments we make do not significantly harm the sustainable investment objectives. We refer to our Position Statement on harmful and controversial products and services which we published last year, in which we define the harmful business activities we avoid as a result of our bottom-up investment process.
• A list of sustainability indicators we will report against (these include carbon emissions, CEO pay ratios, board gender diversity and employee engagement). Our initial choice of indicators was based on relevance, data availability, and alignment with the core metrics we had already decided to start reporting against.
From January 2022 it will be mandatory to start periodic reporting on how Article 9 funds meet their sustainability objective (Level 2 disclosures).
We have updated and filed our European prospectus and will make further refinements if necessary when the SFDR legislation is finalised.
How does SFDR align with other ESG and sustainability regulatory developments?
We are very supportive of regulators addressing sustainability issues. We think they have a vital role to play in creating greater clarity for investors and encouraging more capital to flow towards sustainable investment. But without closer international collaboration and better integration of regulatory initiatives, the main outcome will be a simple proliferation of regimes, rules, definitions and acronyms.
A current example of the need for closer regulatory integration is the contradiction between the SFDR and the Hong Kong ESG regulation. Green or ESG funds authorised by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong must have as their key investment focus one or more of the globally recognised ESG frameworks or principles, such as the UN Global Compact and UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and these must be reflected in their name and investment objective or strategy. While we report against a number of these principles and frameworks, the results are very much an outcome of our investment approach rather than a key investment focus.
Our more eagle-eyed clients may notice that we have opted to include a statement in our European client vehicle prospectus that we do not meet the requirements for ESG status in Hong Kong. The reason for this is that we think sustainability investing is bigger and broader than just ESG investing as it is currently defined by the Hong Kong regulator. This may cause some confusion given our (hopefully) concurrent Article 9 status confirming we have social and environmental investment objectives at the heart of our investment approach.
The Hong Kong regulator acknowledges that their regulation is a first step to enhance disclosure standards, and that they want to be mindful of various local and international regulatory developments. We hope that their approach and that of the European Commission will converge, so that things become clearer and more consistent for clients and all other stakeholders.
What about Brexit and the UK?
In 2019 the UK government published its Green Finance Strategy, which declares the UK’s intention to match the ambitions of the EU's Action Plan. Detailed initiatives have yet to be disclosed and we do not expect the SFDR regulation to be implemented prior to 2022. As a result, we expect there will be a temporary misalignment in the investment policy and strategy between our UK and European product platforms. This is not ideal, but we want to be as proactive as we can on every regulatory front, even if this risks the appearance of uneven progress and temporary variations in our messaging across different product platforms.
How does SFDR relate to the Green Taxonomy?
The Green Taxonomy regulation forms part of the disclosure requirements of the EU Sustainable Action Plan, but it is not the same thing. The EU Taxonomy Regulation is a unified classification system for business activities that can credibly be called ‘green’ or ‘sustainable’ without doing any significant harm or breaching minimum social safeguards. We hope to have Article 9 funds that are contributing to environmental objectives and from January 2022 we will also need to disclose whether they are contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation according to the taxonomy, and the extent to which the underlying investments comply with the taxonomy.
The activities that count as contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation comprise a very small proportion of many sustainable funds. As mentioned in our Project Drawdown article, the MSCI analysis of our Worldwide Sustainability strategy and its green/unsustainable revenue split found that we have zero exposure to unsustainable revenues but only 2.5% exposure to ‘green’ revenues. Having looked at this data more closely, we believe that the only plausible explanation for this very low number is an extremely narrow definition of what counts as ‘green’.
In summary, we are very supportive of the ambitious European strategy to direct more capital to sustainable investment, and of the steps being taken to improve transparency around how funds disclose their sustainability characteristics. However, as mentioned in our response to the European Sustainable Finance Consultation last summer, we cannot iterate enough the importance of a coordinated global approach based on principles, rather than a prescriptive legislative framework.
We believe a combination of clear principles and sufficient room for diverse approaches is the best way to encourage innovation. It might also lead to improved transparency and more rigour around sustainability claims, which would be beneficial for the industry and the long-term future of sustainable investing.
View our list of investment terms to help you understand the terminology within this document.
Subscribe to our updates
To get regular updates and content from Stewart Investors, please register here.
This material is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice and does not take into account any specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. This is not an offer to provide asset management services, is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security or to execute any agreement for portfolio management or investment advisory services and this material has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Before making any investment decision you should conduct your own due diligence and consider your individual investment needs, objectives and financial situation and read the relevant offering documents for details including the risk factors disclosure. Any person who acts upon, or changes their investment position in reliance on, the information contained in these materials does so entirely at their own risk.
We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication but the information contained in the material may be subject to change thereafter without notice. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material.
To the extent this material contains any expression of opinion or forward-looking statements, such opinions and statements are based on assumptions, matters and sources believed to be true and reliable at the time of publication only. This material reflects the views of the individual writers only. Those views may change, may not prove to be valid and may not reflect the views of everyone at First Sentier Investors.
Past performance is not indicative of future performance. All investment involves risks and the value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and you may not get back your original investment. Actual outcomes or results may differ materially from those discussed. Readers must not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as there is no certainty that conditions current at the time of publication will continue.
References to specific securities (if any) are included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the same. Any securities referenced may or may not form part of the holdings of First Sentier Investors' portfolios at a certain point in time, and the holdings may change over time.
References to comparative benchmarks or indices (if any) are for illustrative and comparison purposes only, may not be available for direct investment, are unmanaged, assume reinvestment of income, and have limitations when used for comparison or other purposes because they may have volatility, credit, or other material characteristics (such as number and types of securities) that are different from the funds managed by First Sentier Investors.
Not all First Sentier Investors products are available in all jurisdictions.
This material is neither directed at nor intended to be accessed by persons resident in, or citizens of any country, or types or categories of individual where to allow such access would be unlawful or where it would require any registration, filing, application for any licence or approval or other steps to be taken by First Sentier Investors in order to comply with local laws or regulatory requirements in such country.
This material is intended for ‘professional clients’ (as defined by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, or under MiFID II), ‘wholesale clients’ (as defined under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) or Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (New Zealand) and ‘professional’ and ‘institutional’ investors as may be defined in the jurisdiction in which the material is received, including Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and the United States, and should not be relied upon by or be passed to other persons.
The First Sentier Investors funds referenced in these materials are not registered for sale in the United States and this document is not an offer for sale of funds to US persons (as such term is used in Regulation S promulgated under the 1933 Act). Fund-specific information has been provided to illustrate First Sentier Investors’ expertise in the strategy. Differences between fund-specific constraints or fees and those of a similarly managed mandate would affect performance results.
About First Sentier Investors
References to ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’ are references to First Sentier Investors, a global asset management business which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc (MUFG). Our investment team operates under the trading name of Stewart Investors which is part of the First Sentier Investors Group.
This material may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part, and in any form or by any means circulated without the prior written consent of First Sentier Investors.
We communicate and conduct business through different legal entities in different locations. This material is communicated in:
- Australia and New Zealand by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Ltd, authorised and regulated in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (AFSL 289017; ABN 89 114 194311)
- the European Economic Area by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited, authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI ref no. C182306; Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland; Company no. 629188).
- Hong Kong by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. First Sentier Investors and Stewart Investors are business names of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited.
- Singapore by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) (Company no. 196900420D) and this advertisement or material has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. First Sentier Investors (registration number 53236800B) and Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W) are business divisions of First Sentier Investors (Singapore).
- Japan by First Sentier Investors (Japan) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Service Agency (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Registered Financial Institutions) No.2611).
- the United Kingdom by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ref no. 143359; Registered office: Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7EB; Company no. 2294743).
- the United States by First Sentier Investors (US) LLC, authorised and regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission (RIA 801-93167).
- other jurisdictions, where this document may lawfully be issued, by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited, authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ref no. 122512; Registered office: 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB; Company no. SC079063).
To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not liable for any loss or damage as a result of reliance on any statement or information contained in this document. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment products referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.
© First Sentier Investors Group